A Few Bad Writing Habits

Posted: August 3, 2010 in Uncategorized

I just love some of these posts. Larry sure knows what to give his readers even if he didn’t write it.

A Few Bad Writing Habits
by LARRY on AUGUST 2, 2010
A guest post by humor blogger Chris Scott from DeadCaterpillar.com.

Quick intro from your Storyfix host:
There’s nothing funny about bad writing habits.  Or bad writing.  What follows here is neither, though it is funny. Especially if you miss some of it the first time.  I know I did.  If that’s you, too, it’s time to relax.  We aren’t saving the world here.

This piece is wedged somewhere between the rock of sarcasm and the hard place of dry wit.  It’s a little Norm Crosby… and if you don’t remember that name or his grammar-garbling schtick, you’re way younger than me.  L.

A Few Bad Writing Habits
by Chris Scott

I’d like to take some time to write about a few bad writing habits.

The first bad habit is to use first person unnecessarily.

The second bad thing is to reference the reader in the second person.  Like, you our yours.  You get that.

And the third thing is to create a numeric list of things (like “first” “second” and “third”) to represent new points in your work.That’s the first of three things I’m writing about today.

Below, I would like to tell you about some more things that qualify as bad writing.

You should never reference other information in your work through relative locations (see last sentence of previous paragraph above).

Try not to use slang and cliches, because they may not be down with it, if you see where I’m comin’ from.

Also, don’t separate an independent and dependent clause with a semicolon. Semicolons are evil.  There are cases where you can avoid using one altogether but the problem with that is that you usually end up with a very long, very obnoxious run-on sentence that seems to drone on and on forever and not stop sort of like the energizer bunny that, as you know, keeps on going, keeps on going and keeps on going.

But probably the most egregious, atrocious, despicable practice is to use too many deplorable adjectives.

Use small sentences. 

Don’t unintentionally use incomplete sentences. Like this.

Don’t pontificate with your grandiose words of Brobdingnagian proportions that no one understands. (Editor’s note; I don’t know who Brobdingnag is, either.)

Don’t start a sentence the same way three times consecutively.

Separate new thoughts with paragraphs, otherwise you will end up with walls of text that no one wants to read.  The only thing worthwhile on walls of text is graffiti.

Sometimes “who” and “whom” can be confusing at times. However, there is one thing that is even more confusing than both of those words. That one thing is probably something you will never guess. That thing is very difficult to believe. The thing is when you make the subject of a sentence unclear.What thing are we talking about again?

We will now cover some more important stuff. Yes, that’s correct, signified by the word “we,” there is now more than one author writing this article. Meet my imaginary friend: Ed. He has a particular distaste for denotative errors that can very negatively effect your writing.

Words should be used objectively, in a formal manner, dig what I’m saying?

And sentences that have absolutely no logical connection should not be juxtaposed!

Also, sometimes when you get giddy and excited about something – guess what? The reader isn’t excited along with you! So using exclamation points just makes you look like an idiot! Stop it! Avoid them always! How bout’ that? Can you now see why it is important to stop using exclamation points? And, should stop asking so many questions in your text?  Of course!

Maybe, sometimes you should be more confident in your assertions but you don’t always have to be like that all of the time.

Be brief. Like Hanes. But lay off on the puns. They can sometimes get you into trouble, kind of like how guns, knives, explosives, hate-speech, attitudes, bad friends, overages and long lists can get you into trouble. Use merisms rather than long lists.

But don’t expect people to know the meanings of archaic words.

In conclusion, it’s best to not be so explicit about the fact that you are concluding your work. Your conclusion should start subtly and not end abruptly.

Read more from Chris Scott at Deadcaterpillar.com

Posted with WordPress for BlackBerry.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s